Before You Hire Marketing Help, Define the Job

The founders I work with have often built their marketing themselves, or hired a series of junior marketers without seeing much change. By the time we talk, the materials have drifted. The website tells one story and the sales deck tells another. There’s plenty about product features, but much less about why those features matter to a prospect or why they should choose this company.

That gives us something specific to work on before deciding how much ongoing marketing help the business needs. Someone has to settle what the company should be saying, then work through the materials and make that story consistent. Hiring a senior person still leaves the question of who will do that work.

I sell fractional CMO services, so I have a stake in this discussion. I’m also wary of comparisons that make the author’s own business model the obvious answer. Whichever option you choose, ask what work your company will still need to cover after the contract is signed.

Quick take

  • Separate decisions that need senior judgment from work that needs production capacity.

  • Compare the full cost of delivering the plan, including the people outside the proposed engagement.

  • Agree who can make decisions and how quickly they need to be made.

  • Test the scope against a normal working week before choosing the title or contract.

Start with the work that is getting stuck

For an industrial technology client, my work included translating technical product detail into language for maintenance and plant leaders, then using that language in case studies and sales material. Deciding how to explain the product was part of the assignment. Producing the material was another part, with its own workload.

That distinction matters when you hire. A recommendation to lead with business value still leaves someone to find the supporting evidence and write the pages. The technical team needs to check the claims. Someone has to decide whether the finished material is ready for sales to use.

In that engagement, I did work on both the message and the material. In another scope, those tasks could sit with different people. Ask a prospective provider to explain which parts they will deliver and what they need from your team. My positioning and messaging examples show the kinds of assets involved.

An agency can provide strategy. Define how far it goes

The idea that agencies only execute is a convenient argument for people selling fractional leadership. It also makes a poor selection rule.

Promethean Research’s 2025 Digital Agency Industry Report found that 60% of agencies in its service data offered digital strategy. That tells us strategy is part of many agencies' offerings. It doesn’t establish the quality of that advice or whether it extends to decisions across the client’s whole marketing function.

A campaign strategy can be excellent while leaving the company with an unresolved budget decision. If the agency recommends increasing paid media while sales wants better follow-up material, who decides? Does the agency’s senior strategist have access to the CEO and sales leader? Is that person actually assigned to the account?

I would ask an agency to explain where its responsibility ends. I would ask the same of a fractional CMO. A title on a proposal is a fairly expensive substitute for a scope.

The leadership fee leaves part of the budget unanswered

A part-time leadership contract can reduce the amount of executive time a company commits to buying. The company still needs to fund the work that follows.

Take the messaging work above. A proposal might cover the research and recommendations while leaving the website copy and sales deck to your team. Another might include writing both, with design and website implementation priced separately. Those offers leave you with different amounts of work, even if both are called positioning support.

Put the remaining tasks next to the proposed fee. If nobody has time to do them, budget for help or reduce the scope. The same check applies when you hire an employee: the salary buys that person’s time, and the plan may still require outside skills.

For each option, I would price the same actual work over the same period. Include company time spent briefing and approving it. Add the internal staff and outside specialists needed to complete it, alongside media and software costs. Ask what happens when the plan changes.

A lower fee can be a perfectly reasonable choice when it buys the amount of help you need. The comparison becomes misleading when it assumes fewer purchased hours will cover the same job.

Availability matters when decisions can’t wait

Fractional arrangements work within agreed time. That needs to be reflected in the job.

If the company needs daily people management, frequent executive decisions, and someone regularly coordinating with sales and product, I would examine whether a permanent role is justified. A weekly working session may be insufficient for that workload, no matter how experienced the attendee.

The reverse can also be true. A company might need senior help to settle its positioning, choose priorities, and review delivery without having enough ongoing executive work for a full-time CMO.

Availability alone won’t resolve an unclear mandate. An employee can spend every day in the business and still lack authority to stop a low-value program. A fractional leader can make decisions quickly if the CEO has delegated them and the working cadence supports it.

Before either appointment, agree which decisions the marketing leader owns, which require approval, and what happens between scheduled meetings. If the CEO keeps every decision, build the CEO’s time into the plan.

If you use several suppliers, someone still needs to brief them, resolve conflicting recommendations, and approve the work. Agree who will do that before adding another provider, or the CEO may end up managing the same queue of decisions.

Write the brief before you choose the model

I would start with a single page covering the next 90 days. Write down the business problem, the decisions that need an owner, and the work required. Name who can deliver each part today. Where there is a gap, estimate the capacity and budget needed to fill it.

Then ask each prospective provider or hire to explain what they would own, what they would need from the company, and what would remain uncovered. Test that answer against a normal week, including an urgent sales request or a delayed approval.

If the immediate problem is contained, such as resolving positioning or reviewing a GTM plan, scope that assignment first. You may learn enough from the work to write a much better brief for ongoing support.

And if you're still weighing your options, my comparison of fractional CMOs, marketing agencies and full-time CMOs examines the responsibilities, costs and execution capacity of each.

But if you're considering working with me, my fractional CMO page explains what I take on and what remains with your team.

Jeremy Woolf

I’m CEO of First Domino Marketing and a senior B2B brand strategist and fractional CMO.

I work with B2B technology and professional services companies, usually founder-led, sales-led, or lean marketing teams that need a clearer story, sharper priorities, stronger proof, and sales-ready language the team can use.

My work covers positioning and messaging, market and category strategy, GTM planning and execution, website and sales narrative, buyer research, proof development, and practical marketing support.

I bring 30+ years of B2B marketing, brand, communications, and business-development experience across enterprise technology, global agencies, startups, and growth-stage companies.

https://www.firstdomino.marketing/
Next
Next

Before You Publish More Content, Fix Your Story